With the true world we have also abolished the apparent one

The passage

With the true world we have also abolished the apparent one.

GD, »Wie die ›wahre Welt‹ endlich zur Fabel wurde«, stage 6: »Die wahre Welt haben wir abgeschafft: welche Welt blieb übrig? die scheinbare vielleicht?... Aber nein! mit der wahren Welt haben wir auch die scheinbare abgeschafft!« The statement is the stage's last sentence; the self-questioning before it (»welche Welt blieb übrig? die scheinbare vielleicht?... Aber nein!«) is in the passage. The stage opens by recording the abolition stage 5 called for (»schaffen wir sie ab!« / »haben wir abgeschafft«); that is a narrative sequence, not a step that draws one claim from another, so the map sets no dependency on c-nietzsche-true-world-idea-refuted. The stage gives no ground for »mit der wahren Welt ... auch die scheinbare«; the map reads it with the first proposition of »Die ›Vernunft‹ in der Philosophie« 6, c-nietzsche-grounds-for-apparent-establish-reality, where the world called apparent is real, so that what is abolished is the predicate "apparent", not the world. Kant's c-kant-without-things-in-themselves-appearance-without-appearing says that without things in themselves there would be appearance without anything that appears, and treats that as absurd; this stage affirms the antecedent and denies the consequent as well, rejecting the pair Kant's conditional presupposes, which the comparison page will set side by side. The map sets no link between them, since this stage does not state Kant's conditional.

Whose voice. The map reads this stage, with stage 5, as Nietzsche's own, following the owner's reading of 2026-10-10 (CHANGELOG.md): its parenthesis ends in »INCIPIT ZARATHUSTRA«, and stage 5's names the free spirits, »Teufelslärm aller freien Geister«; the chapter has no sentence that separates the two. Stage 4 alone keeps its framing as the positivist stage, for the reason given on a-nietzsche-true-world-does-not-obligate. It may be disputed like any other reading.