The true world, as unattained and so unknown, is consequently also not consoling, redeeming or obligating

The passage

At the positivist stage of the history of the error: the true world, as unattained also unknown, is consequently also not consoling, redeeming, obligating.

GD, »Wie die ›wahre Welt‹ endlich zur Fabel wurde«, stage 4: »Und als unerreicht auch unbekannt. Folglich auch nicht tröstend, erlösend, verpflichtend: wozu könnte uns etwas Unbekanntes verpflichten?...« The whole sentence, with its three predicates. The map's argument a-nietzsche-true-world-does-not-obligate reaches only the third, because the ground the stage gives speaks of obligation alone; its conclusion is the narrower claim c-nietzsche-true-world-not-obligating, and the map sets no dependency here, since »tröstend« and »erlösend« are drawn by the same »Folglich« from a ground that does not mention them. The framing as the positivist stage's position is explained on the argument.